While a couple of foreign rules took place in Africa with different rule systems and governments, it is not difficult to understand how the British empire ruled territories in Africa before the latter eventually secured its independence. The odd question is, is Africa truly free from the British rule? Are the vestiges of their rule back in history not traceable to the so-called rule of the independent African ruling system today?
In this article, we shall patiently look into how the British empire ruled territories in Africa.
How the British Empire Ruled Territories in Africa.
It is difficult to make a sweeping judgement about British rule in Africa.
The arrival of the British certainly disrupted traditional African culture and ways of living. It widened the gap between African chiefs and their people. It changed African economies and made them dependent on trade with Britain.
The British invested in the development of roads and railways.
They brought new ideas about education and medicine (although they also brought diseases with them). British officials generally treated the Africans better than the settlers who were left behind when the British pulled out. The British were also generally more tolerant of local religions and customs than other European rulers.
The British rule in Africa became so influential across lands in North Africa, such as Egypt, much of West Africa, and huge territories in Southern and East Africa.
Living under British rule in Africa was different, depending on which part of Africa you lived in. However, there is no doubt that British rule had a huge impact on the lives of millions of Africans even to date.
It is no longer news that Africans had few rights under the British rule. They got the lowest paid and most dangerous jobs in the mines. Also, cultures and interests of indigenous peoples were ignored. During British West Africa’s history, interracial relations were frowned upon, and couples might be discriminated against. There were even certain policies that deported the wives of these relationships back to Britain and denied them access to any of these colonies
British Rule in Egypt
In Egypt British rule had important political and economic effects. The main interest of the British in Egypt was to keep control of the trade route that ran through Egypt to the Red Sea and then on to India. Egyptians were also an important market for British industries to sell to. On the whole, the rich and powerful ruling classes in Egypt accepted British rule. They often sent their children to be educated in Britain. They became lawyers and administrators on behalf of the British. The British did not try to interfere with the Islamic beliefs of the vast majority of Egyptians. In fact, British governors actually provided subsidies to help with the building of mosques. Even so, many Egyptians resented British rule. By the early 1900s there was a small but growing movement for independence in Egypt.
The British Empire in West Africa
In West Africa the impact of British rule was more dramatic. The British had been heavily involved in the West African slave trade in the 1700s. The trade was abolished in the early 1800s and the British put a lot of effort into trying to wipe out slavery and the slave trade in all of Africa. This changed Britain’s relations with West Africa. British merchants and traders developed close links with the rulers of the many different nations on the West Coast of Africa, such as the rulers of Benin, Dahomey and Asante. These nations provided Britain with gold, luxury foods and many other goods.
Throughout the 1800s British traders and politicians became increasingly involved with the leaders of these nations. They made alliances and helped out some nations in their wars with others. By the 1880s West Africa was dominated by Britain. Local chieftains ruled their own peoples using their own customs. However, they paid taxes to Britain.
As in Egypt, the families of chieftains often gained from British rule. They adopted the English language and British clothes. They were educated in Britain. They took up some posts in the civil service in West Africa, although the senior posts were always taken by British officials. For ordinary West Africans, British rule brought major changes to their everyday lives. The British brought in a system of owning, buying and selling land, which meant many Africans had to pay rent. This meant that instead of growing crops for food, they had to grow crops to sell (to pay the rent). These were usually crops like rubber or cocoa. They also found that their traditional crafts were sometimes destroyed by competition from goods produced in British factories.
The British Empire with the Boers in South Africa
In South Africa there was a complex mix of peoples – British, Boers (descendants of Dutch settlers from the 1600s) and native African peoples like the Xhosa, the Zulu and the Matabele. The British wanted to control South Africa because it was one of the trade routes to India. However, when gold and diamonds were discovered in the 1860s-1880s their interest in the region increased. This brought them into conflict with the Boers. The Boers disliked British rule. They wanted a simple farming life. British rule made their country increasingly a country of industry and business. The Boers also felt that the native Africans were inferior and should be treated as slaves. The British insisted that Africans should have rights. Despite this, they fought several wars with African peoples in the 1870s and effectively broke the power of the Zulus.
Conclusion
The British put enormous resources into combating slavery. British missionaries and explorers, with the help of British officials and the military, worked tirelessly to stop the slave trade from East Africa to Arabia. Against this, some historians argue that fighting slavery, building railways etc. simply helped Britain’s trading interests.
No Responses